 |
|
| BONE7a works just fine with the latest version |
|
|
By ablyss - Posted on August 28, 2002 - 19:56:36 (#2885)
Current version when comment was posted: 2.0 Beta 1 |
|
|
I've used BONE7a with this version for sometime and hardly a crash that I can remember.
So try first. You might be suprised.
~Ablyss
|
|
| bone |
|
|
By Pink Chick - Posted on August 28, 2002 - 16:05:05 (#2883)
Current version when comment was posted: 2.0 Beta 1 |
|
|
well, a new beta for netserver, but where is the boned one?
|
|
| Question |
|
|
By Kreeblah - Posted on August 15, 2002 - 06:15:51 (#2656)
Current version when comment was posted: 2.0 Beta 1 |
|
|
Would it be possible to set the date of last modification to the date when an e-mail was sent/received?
|
|
| PPC |
|
|
By NathanW - Posted on May 27, 2002 - 19:00:25 (#1578)
Current version when comment was posted: 2.0 Beta 1 |
|
|
PPC is a fairly high development priority (I use PPC, so I can guarantee it works well). Also, there will be a new release RSN (as soon as we can get Axel back to work)
As to populating the fields, use the command-line mail_parser tool.
-Nathan
|
|
| Works great, too! |
|
|
By brian68 - Posted on May 27, 2002 - 03:38:14 (#1566)
Current version when comment was posted: 2.0 Beta 1 |
|
|
The PPC version of MDR works really well. There are only minor issues, which I'm sure will be resolved in the next release. I have not compiled the patch for PPC yet. I am 50% chicken to use it, since MDR works well on my system, and 50% curious whether the patch will be added to the MDR project officially. I can hardly stand waiting for the next MDR....
|
|
| PPC version. |
|
|
By BGA - Posted on May 26, 2002 - 23:52:57 (#1562)
Current version when comment was posted: 2.0 Beta 1 |
|
|
Yes, it does compile under PPC without problems.
|
|
| Technically, yes. :) |
|
|
By BGA - Posted on May 26, 2002 - 23:51:36 (#1561)
Current version when comment was posted: 2.0 Beta 1 |
|
|
We are still working on it, but we are also involved with other projects that take away our time. Right now the CVS version has lots of fixes when compared to the BeBits version and we are just waiting on some BeMail fixes from Axel to release an updated version.
|
|
| anybody still working on this? |
|
|
By marcone - Posted on May 26, 2002 - 22:17:36 (#1559)
Current version when comment was posted: 2.0 Beta 1 |
|
|
Given the number of bugs that are >30 days old, is anybody still working on this?
|
|
| bemail patch |
|
|
By ljr - Posted on May 26, 2002 - 19:30:17 (#1557)
Current version when comment was posted: 2.0 Beta 1 |
|
|
Source is included so you can compile (and make changes) it under beos/ppc ...
|
|
| BeMail patch cross-platform? |
|
|
By brian68 - Posted on May 26, 2002 - 08:39:36 (#1552)
Current version when comment was posted: 2.0 Beta 1 |
|
|
Does it work on x86 only, or PPC, too?
|
|
| use .eml from Outlook express |
|
|
By ljr - Posted on May 26, 2002 - 00:36:57 (#1548)
Current version when comment was posted: 2.0 Beta 1 |
|
|
As i spend almost of my time on Be, i wanted to import my outlook mails... A good way is to save outlook messages in a folder (files are *.eml). Copy them on a Befs volume and open them with bemail (mark .eml to be recognize as email thru FileTypes). I modified also bemail to populate the From/To/subject befs attributes when it opens a mail... (source available at http://ljr.free.fr/bemail-patch.zip)
|
|
| MDR Rocks! |
|
|
By brian68 - Posted on May 23, 2002 - 06:35:18 (#1519)
Current version when comment was posted: 2.0 Beta 1 |
|
|
I get the occasional "empty" message ("e-farts"?), but generally it has been very reliable and I enjoy the improved configuration panel. I am eager to see the next update...
|
|
| re: guess at why |
|
|
By BigZaphod - Posted on May 19, 2002 - 08:14:14 (#1490)
Current version when comment was posted: 2.0 Beta 1 |
|
|
You know, that makes perfect sense. It also means I forgot to make it delete talkback comments when an app is destroyed, which is a bit of a db-bloating bug. Thanks!
|
|
| guess at why |
|
|
By Jess - Posted on May 19, 2002 - 08:01:35 (#1489)
Current version when comment was posted: 2.0 Beta 1 |
|
|
I think when some one deletes an app the posts are store like this post belones to app 4002 when you delete 4002 you cant see the post anymore. but when a new app is posted now 4002 all the posts to the old 4002 app are given to that app. the dano divx was put up right after I deleted one of my apps & I had posted to say sorry I couldnt handle the dl bandwidth - then poof my post was gone till a few min later till the dano divx was posted - also look on the dano divx for current version its my apps current version!
|
|
| re: wierd talkback issues.. |
|
|
By BigZaphod - Posted on May 19, 2002 - 07:52:41 (#1488)
Current version when comment was posted: 2.0 Beta 1 |
|
|
Drop us (bebits) an e-mail if you notice this again. I have no idea how it could possibly be happening, but if it is, it needs to be looked into, obviously. :-) I made a small change to the posting script, but I don't know how it could have caused any of this. Wierd. I think BeBits is getting too complex with too many automated features and is starting to take on a life of its own.. :-P
|
|
| the wierdness is REAL! |
|
|
By Jess - Posted on May 19, 2002 - 06:22:19 (#1487)
Current version when comment was posted: 2.0 Beta 1 |
|
|
My comment on my BeOS distrib ended up on the dano divx
|
|
| strange bebits talkback linkings? |
|
|
By unlyrn. - Posted on May 19, 2002 - 03:37:05 (#1486)
Current version when comment was posted: 2.0 Beta 1 |
|
|
hmmm - something fishy is going on with the talkback comments - they're frequently getting assigned to the wrong app (see the 'got it working' comment below, amongst others)
just thought I'd mention it, for those who are getting fonfused by the comments :)
|
|
| Thank you (and it's not what you think) |
|
|
By IgRussell - Posted on May 19, 2002 - 00:45:52 (#1485)
Current version when comment was posted: 2.0 Beta 1 |
|
|
Thank you for your help. Regarding to the P.S. don't worry, I like your app a lot. It's just I would like to try Postmaster 1.1.1 on another computer, and I was running the MD Replacement in both.
Nothing to say about your work, right?. It's perfect.
|
|
| my apologies... |
|
|
By myyr - Posted on May 18, 2002 - 15:35:06 (#1481)
Current version when comment was posted: 2.0 Beta 1 |
|
|
|
| it's alive! |
|
|
By myyr - Posted on May 18, 2002 - 15:28:18 (#1479)
Current version when comment was posted: 2.0 Beta 1 |
|
|
got it working, did nothing for that (got new gogo...?).
me thinx it just hates some bad music... or encoders.
beautiful, needs more effects and tools to work with.
|
|
| how to get back to stage one |
|
|
By stippi - Posted on May 18, 2002 - 15:24:02 (#1478)
Current version when comment was posted: 2.0 Beta 1 |
|
|
MailDaemonReplacement replaces the following files:
/boot/beos/apps/BeMail
/boot/beos/preferences/E-mail
/boot/beos/system/servers/mail_daemon
/boot/beos/system/lib/libmail.so
Additionally, it installs addons to the user addon folder, which you don't need to worry about. (You can delete the "mail_daemon" folder in /boot/home/config/addons, if you absolutely don't want them...)
Replace the files mentioned above with the originals from your CD or, if you chose so at the install of MailDaemonReplacement, from the backup archive it made, which should be in /boot/home/. You can then quit the mail_daemon from the DeskBar menu, and launch the old one in a Terminal type "/boot/beos/system/servers/mail_daemon &", or double click it in the Tracker. That should bring you back to the original mail system.
Regards,
-Stephan
P.S. It would be interesting to know what made you want to switch back.
|
|
| Little trouble |
|
|
By IgRussell - Posted on May 18, 2002 - 14:01:03 (#1477)
Current version when comment was posted: 2.0 Beta 1 |
|
|
Hi, I am new in BeOS and I would like to try some other mail flavors around. I have a Mail Daemon Replacement installed, and I would like to know how it can be unistalled. I am a bit worried about trashing all, because of the ad that appears when you install it. How can I return to the BeOS BeMail standard version without creating a mess?.
|
|
| Fixed BeMail Binary Release |
|
|
By Blue Monk - Posted on May 5, 2002 - 05:19:43 (#1302)
Current version when comment was posted: 2.0 Beta 1 |
|
|
The bug in BeMail that crashes it when you fill in the To: field before picking an account hasn't been included in a binary release. If you're interested in such a fix, please go to: http://mdr.frood.org. I've not actually made any changes, just built BeMail from the CVS source (and it works beautifully).
Kudos to the team and keep on truckin'.
|
|
| Attributeless attachments |
|
|
By copyguy - Posted on March 27, 2002 - 00:16:03 (#686)
Current version when comment was posted: 2.0 Beta 1 |
|
|
I just read the MDR bug report. The following bug covers what I'm saying nicely.
[ 533903 ] crash with missing attributes.
Sorry for all the prior needless confusion...
|
|
| Trouble with Atributeless attachments |
|
|
By copyguy - Posted on March 26, 2002 - 02:30:12 (#684)
Current version when comment was posted: 2.0 Beta 1 |
|
|
Please forgive any incorrect terminology, my understanding of email structure is incomplete.
The following is copied from the raw view of the email I was referring to. What I called the attribute section is that part marked with asterisks. If I delete those parts, The datafile is reported correctly and I can save it.
I may have incorrectly assumed that the original version of BeMail and Mail Daemon were used the create this message. I am awaiting cofirmation of this from the author.
--_------_BeOS.rmp.1016729849_------_
* Content-Type: multipart/x-bfile;
* boundary="++++++BFile1294276203732++++++"
*
--++++++BFile1294276203732++++++
Content-Type: application/octet-stream;
name="keyfile.soundplay"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
( data making up file here )
--++++++BFile1294276203732++++++
* Content-Type: application/x-be_attribute;
* name="BeOS Attributes"
* Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
*
* --++++++BFile1294276203732++++++--
--_------_BeOS.rmp.1016729849_------_--
|
|
| Huh? |
|
|
By NathanW - Posted on March 24, 2002 - 20:22:46 (#668)
Current version when comment was posted: 2.0 Beta 1 |
|
|
It has no attributes, but an attribute section? And the original BeMail both works and doesn't work? Could you please say all that again?
|
|
| correction |
|
|
By copyguy - Posted on March 22, 2002 - 23:59:28 (#657)
Current version when comment was posted: 2.0 Beta 1 |
|
|
I meant 'I recently RECIEVED an email..'
|
|
| Trouble with Atributeless Attachments |
|
|
By copyguy - Posted on March 22, 2002 - 23:17:40 (#656)
Current version when comment was posted: 2.0 Beta 1 |
|
|
I was recently sent an email using the original BeMail with an attachment that had no attributes. This resulted in an attachment that could not be directly opened or saved. Clicking on it yielded "An error occurred trying to save enclosure". The Enclosure link says <Enclosure: could not handle>. Opening the email with the original version works fine. I had to edit the message and delete the attribute information from the attachment section in order to get the attachment. Am I correct in assuming this to be a problem with BeMail?
|
|
| filter creation |
|
|
By NathanW - Posted on March 3, 2002 - 23:50:18 (#525)
Current version when comment was posted: 2.0 Beta 1 |
|
|
Until we get around to actually documenting this (I'm assuming you are talking about writing MDR filter add-ons, if you're not, look at the Match Header filter), you have two options. The first is to try to figure it out from source code and headers (most of which are well documented). This is not reccomended. The second is to bother us (which is reccomended). Simply drop us an e-mail and we'll be more than happy to help you.
|
|
| filters |
|
|
By copyguy - Posted on March 3, 2002 - 16:14:57 (#517)
Current version when comment was posted: 2.0 Beta 1 |
|
|
This may seem silly, but, Where can I find out how to create MDR filters?
|
|
| BeMail |
|
|
By BGA - Posted on March 2, 2002 - 15:48:35 (#514)
Current version when comment was posted: 2.0 Beta 1 |
|
|
BeMail is the only email client right now that makes use of our mail_daemon stuff. There is a guy workingg on a new email client that will use it too.
|
|
| Clients? |
|
|
By xfilecsm - Posted on March 1, 2002 - 17:59:27 (#512)
Current version when comment was posted: 2.0 Beta 1 |
|
|
Which email clients work best with MDR, especially for attachments?
|
|
| net_server crash and filters. |
|
|
By BGA - Posted on February 28, 2002 - 23:12:43 (#501)
Current version when comment was posted: 2.0 Beta 1 |
|
|
Well, we fixed the net-server crash we were able to reproduce. This one happened if you tried to reboot after you have received emails at least once. If you found another one, post it to our bug tracking system link in the bebits page).
The "is" in the filter means the header must match the regexp following it. The regexp can be, for example, *bga* with will match any email that has the string bga anywhere in the header used.
|
|
| Two Thungs |
|
|
By skiversoul - Posted on February 28, 2002 - 04:28:49 (#489)
Current version when comment was posted: 2.0 Beta 1 |
|
|
Bruno & Co. - Having 2 MDR installs and using 1 while both partitions are mounted seems OK.
PS. with respect to the header filter I want 'contains' rather than 'is.' Would be much more useful. Thanks for your hard work.
|
|
| Crash on shutdown bug *NOT* fixed |
|
|
By misza - Posted on February 28, 2002 - 03:29:00 (#488)
Current version when comment was posted: 2.0 Beta 1 |
|
|
First of all congrats on a wonderful release :^)
However, the crash on shutdown bug still isn't fixed, this is how to reproduce it. You actually have to have the system booted for quite a few hours, use MDR to check email that sort of stuff over that time, then shutdown/reboot to have MDR crash. If you boot into BeOS and then exit straight away it doesn't crash, it just does so after a big uptime. If you want I can send you some debug info typing "sc" in the debug thingy after it crashes.
|
|
| Yep. It is expected. |
|
|
By BGA - Posted on February 27, 2002 - 23:12:13 (#484)
Current version when comment was posted: 2.0 Beta 1 |
|
|
You actually do have a new message. It is just that it is in the trash now. We are considering ways to "fix" this.
|
|
| "New Mail" oddity |
|
|
By 3148 - Posted on February 27, 2002 - 21:09:48 (#480)
Current version when comment was posted: 2.0 Beta 1 |
|
|
I've run into something that's a little annoying and I'm not sure if it's expected bahavior. Typically, I keep my inbox folder open on my desktop. When a new message arrives, it appears in the inbox and little mailbox icon shows a message in it. If I open the email and then delete it, the mailbox shows empty. However, if I just delete the message from my inbox without reading it, I still see a message in the mailbox icon and it says I have 1 new message. I have to right-click on the mailbox icon, view it and delete it there for it to go away. Is this expected bahavior?
|
|
| I am not sure. |
|
|
By BGA - Posted on February 25, 2002 - 13:27:51 (#446)
Current version when comment was posted: 2.0 Beta 1 |
|
|
if the two partitions are not mounted at the same time, it is 100% safe. You will have to try it with both partitions mounted... And let me know if it works.
It should work ok, unless you have different versions installed in each partition.
|
|
| 2 Installs on same machine |
|
|
By skiversoul - Posted on February 25, 2002 - 04:24:22 (#442)
Current version when comment was posted: 2.0 Beta 1 |
|
|
Is it OK to have MDR on each of two BeOS partitions on the same machine?
|
|
| Yep |
|
|
By skiversoul - Posted on February 25, 2002 - 02:02:53 (#441)
Current version when comment was posted: 2.0 Beta 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
| |
Recent Downloads - # 10
Total Downloads - # 69
Total Views - # 44
User Ratings - # 83
|
|
|
|
 |
| |
E-Mail
|
|
|
|
 |
|
1. BePodder - 9.80
2. QEMU - 9.68
3. ScummVM - 9.57
4. cpu_fix - 9.42
5. Jukebox - 9.40
6. libdl.so - 9.40
7. Haiku AGP busm... - 9.35
8. vim6 - 9.31
9. Beezer - 9.26
10. HandBrake - 9.25
|
|
|
|
 |
|
1. BeOS 5 Perso... - 13,599
2. Realtek RTL8... - 13,114
3. Ati Radeon G... - 12,582
4. Ensoniq Audio... - 7,565
5. ATI Rage 128... - 7,442
6. USB Joystick... - 5,663
7. Broadcom 440x... - 5,411
8. S3 Trio 64 v2... - 4,726
9. USB Serial dr... - 4,707
10. Intel Extreme... - 4,468
|
|
|
|
 |
| You are not logged in.
Login
|
|
|
|
 |
|
