 |
|
| Re: Installation |
|
|
By stippi - Posted on August 1, 2003 - 10:28:40 (#8400)
Current version when comment was posted: 2.2.0 |
|
|
You guys are doing just great! No doubt about that. I know what you are talking about regarding details... The last remaining "details" always sum up to a lot of work. They are important nevertheless, that's why I brought it up. Really, don't get me wrong, your work is greatly appreciated and these few missing details don't spoil it!
Best regards,
-Stephan
|
|
| IMAP Bug |
|
|
By NathanW - Posted on August 1, 2003 - 01:47:05 (#8395)
Current version when comment was posted: 2.2.0 |
|
|
Yikes! Sorry about that. Sounds like you have a buggy IMAP server. I'll add a box for specifying the mailbox root. Again, my apologies.
-Nathan
|
|
| IMAP Server Folder |
|
|
By bobman - Posted on August 1, 2003 - 01:20:18 (#8394)
Current version when comment was posted: 2.2.0 |
|
|
I wish I had tried this before this final version. :(
On my IMAP server $HOME is set as the IMAP root for my mailboxes. Therefore, every file in my home directory is considered a mailbox.
Most IMAP clients let you specify where on the server the mailboxes are (like ~/Mail), but MDR doesn't seem to have that option.
This is a definate bug. :) I just downloaded 200MB of my home directory to my box cause of it.
I know NathanW will have a genius fix for this in a matter of minutes. I look forward to that minute.
|
|
| Re: Installation |
|
|
By Alexander G M Smith - Posted on July 31, 2003 - 17:15:05 (#8383)
Current version when comment was posted: 2.2.0 |
|
|
Maybe in a later version, when we have a real installer. The current install just unzips the menu links into the menu link directory, overwriting any old ones. This came in useful recently when some of the items (queries) were incorrect (marked as temporary so they mysteriously disappeared after a week) and needed to be replaced.
There's a lot of other unfinished stuff, like the font sensitivity you mentioned. But unfortunately there is not enough time to work on the details when there are so many other pressing projects.
- Alex
|
|
| Installation |
|
|
By stippi - Posted on July 31, 2003 - 09:36:58 (#8375)
Current version when comment was posted: 2.2.0 |
|
|
Hi,
I had just configured my Deskbar popup menu, when I discovered the new version. Downloaded and installed, but guess what, it just put all the entries I removed back into the menu. I think the installation should not always act like a full install, but take the potential (likely?) "update" situation into account. If the MDR team put new menu items into the menu meanwhile, they could still be copied in the settings folder, but not the ones that have been there before and have obviously been removed by the user for customization. Other than that... MDR rocks! Oh wait... Email prefs are still not fully font sensitive. Oh well. :-)
-Stephan
|
|
| Busted Source Builds |
|
|
By NathanW - Posted on July 31, 2003 - 02:21:08 (#8373)
Current version when comment was posted: 2.2.0 |
|
|
Sounds like some compilation/linking issue. The BONE binaries will be up later, so wait.
|
|
| Incomplete Email Preferences |
|
|
By gosseyn - Posted on July 30, 2003 - 23:40:28 (#8370)
Current version when comment was posted: 2.2.0 |
|
|
I made it from the sources under BeOS 5.0.3 + BONE and my email preferences panel do not have areas to be filled with the POP or IMAP servers informations. Just the POP/IMAP choice and email folder's paths.
I'll try an older version for BONE.
|
|
| and BONE |
|
|
By IgRussell - Posted on July 30, 2003 - 22:45:43 (#8369)
Current version when comment was posted: 2.2.0 |
|
|
can it be for BONE too?. I mean, a x86 BONE version.
|
|
| /bin/sh: build_utils/LanguageSpecificInstallFileName: No such file or directory |
|
|
By LupusMic - Posted on July 30, 2003 - 22:35:59 (#8368)
Current version when comment was posted: 2.2.0 |
|
|
If you got this message at build time, create the 'build_utils' repertory, and launch make again.
|
|
| WHEEEE... no x86? |
|
|
By IgRussell - Posted on July 30, 2003 - 22:26:44 (#8367)
Current version when comment was posted: 2.2.0 |
|
|
where is tha x86 app?. Ppplz.....
|
|
| Re: Code reutilization |
|
|
By Alexander G M Smith - Posted on July 24, 2003 - 17:35:53 (#8299)
Current version when comment was posted: 2.1.0 Release Candidate 3 |
|
|
Yes, you could use the Mail Kit clone that's in MDR. Or just write your e-mail message files directly and attach the appropriate attributes - then the daemon will pick them up and automagically send them. See the example Mass Mailing script files in MDR.
If you want to parse mail messages (MIME headers, character set conversion, file attachments, etc), then you can use the MDR C++ library too, which is part of the new libmail.so.
- Alex
|
|
| Code reutilization |
|
|
By Jack Burton - Posted on July 24, 2003 - 12:12:24 (#8298)
Current version when comment was posted: 2.1.0 Release Candidate 3 |
|
|
A question:
Since your project replaces the original mail kit (basically), I can't understand why every developer has to reimplement the mail api for his own project. Ok, probably I should ask the other developers :P
What I want to say is: If I wrote a mail client, could I just write the gui app and use this api to send/receive mails ?
|
|
| Words file? |
|
|
By ryanknapper - Posted on July 22, 2003 - 20:50:35 (#8262)
Current version when comment was posted: 2.1.0 Release Candidate 3 |
|
|
Thank you for adding the option to correct my spelling by default. Now when I use BeMail the first time it tells me that I need the Words file, which I have.
|
|
| Re: BUG-Br HQ - BONE zipfile corrupt |
|
|
By Alexander G M Smith - Posted on July 19, 2003 - 17:03:26 (#8226)
Current version when comment was posted: 2.1.0 Release Candidate 3 |
|
|
It's been fixed, and uploaded to SourceForge too.
|
|
| BUG-Br HQ - BONE zipfile corrupt |
|
|
By jonas.kirilla - Posted on July 19, 2003 - 12:41:07 (#8225)
Current version when comment was posted: 2.1.0 Release Candidate 3 |
|
|
The BUG-Br HQ - BONE zipfile is corrupt.
|
|
| Re: SMTP Server Failed |
|
|
By Alexander G M Smith - Posted on July 16, 2003 - 22:48:11 (#8203)
Current version when comment was posted: 2.1.0 Release Candidate 3 |
|
|
Try the debug version of the SMTP protocol plugin. It prints out all the interactions with the server. Instructions (see 2003-07-11 15:02 entry there) and download are at:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=768506&group_id=26926&atid=388726
|
|
| SMTP Problems |
|
|
By NathanW - Posted on July 16, 2003 - 22:13:12 (#8200)
Current version when comment was posted: 2.1.0 Release Candidate 3 |
|
|
That's quite strange. Did you set a hostname in network prefs?
|
|
| smtp server failed |
|
|
By timpanic - Posted on July 16, 2003 - 22:03:47 (#8199)
Current version when comment was posted: 2.1.0 Release Candidate 3 |
|
|
An error occured while sending message 1 to ...
550 relaying to <bla@bla.de> prohibtited by administrator...
I get this all the time with EVERY bemail version. With beam it just works without any type of authentication.Just pop user name and password and works,smtp only smtp server, but with bemail.no chance !
Does anybody know how to fix this ?
Help ! i hate dead icons in my deskbar !
|
|
| IMAP |
|
|
By NathanW - Posted on July 16, 2003 - 00:14:48 (#8187)
Current version when comment was posted: 2.1.0 Release Candidate 2 |
|
|
That's hardly a fair charcterization. I'm merely abstracting out the back end to prepare for things like Hotmail and NNTP support. The upshot for IMAP users is that the "Synchronizing Mailboxes" operation will soon be eliminated for good.
The current version of IMAP in CVS has no (known) bugs, and I hope I can persuade everyone to do a release in the next day or two. Sorry about their intransigence :P
-Nathan
|
|
| Re: IMAP issues |
|
|
By Alexander G M Smith - Posted on July 15, 2003 - 21:59:29 (#8185)
Current version when comment was posted: 2.1.0 Release Candidate 2 |
|
|
A next release is almost ready, waiting for some Japanese translations. However, Nathan said he's rewriting the IMAP code (yet again), even though he fixed up a lot of the bugs since the last version. Maybe we should reclassify this as Alpha rather than Release Candidate? :-)
If you can't wait, and want to try the bug fixes, you can compile the day old version from SourceForge, or I can e-mail you a compiled version (but only NetServer or PPC, I can't do BONE).
- Alex
|
|
| IMAP issues |
|
|
By ryanknapper - Posted on July 15, 2003 - 21:29:00 (#8184)
Current version when comment was posted: 2.1.0 Release Candidate 2 |
|
|
Oh for the love of Kevin, when will another release be made which includes the updated IMAP code? It's killing me to see it download my entire mailbox over and over and over and over...
It seems completely unaware of what messages already exist on the local machine.
|
|
| button position |
|
|
By brian68 - Posted on July 15, 2003 - 19:51:58 (#8183)
Current version when comment was posted: 2.1.0 Release Candidate 2 |
|
|
One way to go, and one that has never resulted in an accidental 'send' for me is:
[Send Now] [Send Later] [Save as Draft] etc.
This is the layout in Entourage. If you mean to save a draft and stray to the left a bit, you will be sending later. Very easy to undo that before it's too late. :-)
|
|
| Re: Toolbar buttons |
|
|
By Alexander G M Smith - Posted on July 15, 2003 - 14:51:46 (#8178)
Current version when comment was posted: 2.1.0 Release Candidate 2 |
|
|
Where should the Send button be? If it's next to some other button, like signature, then it can still accidentally be hit.
For that matter, what are those divider lines doing in the button bar? It lists:
New | Send Save Signature | Print Trash Inbox MailFolder
They don't seem to group the buttons into meaningful groups. Perhaps it's left over groupings from the message viewing mode:
New | Reply Forward Print Trash Spam | Next Previous Inbox MailFolder
That makes a bit more sense grouping-wise.
- Alex
|
|
| Toolbar buttons |
|
|
By skiversoul - Posted on July 15, 2003 - 04:42:31 (#8174)
Current version when comment was posted: 2.1.0 Release Candidate 2 |
|
|
Send and save buttons should not be next to each other. I just sent an e-mail when I meant to save it.
|
|
| Spell Check Default On? |
|
|
By Alexander G M Smith - Posted on July 12, 2003 - 23:48:34 (#8143)
Current version when comment was posted: 2.1.0 Release Candidate 2 |
|
|
Are you sure you want spell checking to be on by default? Currently it leaves behind annoying cursor graphics glitches for some reason. But I can see how it would be useful. I'll see if I can put it in as an option.
- Alex
|
|
| Spelling |
|
|
By ryanknapper - Posted on July 12, 2003 - 11:56:47 (#8140)
Current version when comment was posted: 2.1.0 Release Candidate 2 |
|
|
Could there be an option to always have the spell check turned on? That would hepl a lot.
|
|
| fixed in rc2 |
|
|
By sikosis - Posted on July 12, 2003 - 04:08:06 (#8135)
Current version when comment was posted: 2.1.0 Release Candidate 2 |
|
|
sweet looks like it's fixed in RC2 :)
|
|
| Crashing when trying to Send Emails |
|
|
By sikosis - Posted on July 12, 2003 - 04:03:53 (#8134)
Current version when comment was posted: 2.1.0 Release Candidate 2 |
|
|
On my BeOS 5.03 Pro plus bone7a PC the latest MDR 2.1 Golden Master/1 crashes when I try to send emails.
It pops up with "An error occurred while sending the message to : 250 Command DATA Processed mail data Ok" alert.
I click OK, then OK and keep clicking it until it crashes.
loading symbols
segment violation occurred
.LFB11:
.LFB11:
+0022 ed1300b6: * 1841bf0f movsx 0x00000018(%ecx), %eax
Sikosis:sc
frame retaddr
fd076540 ed11f7a9 Zoidberg::Mail::ChainRunner::MessageReceived(BMessage *) + 000004f5
fd076a44 ec19a9c0 BLooper::DispatchMessage(BMessage *, BHandler *) + 0000007c
fd076a5c ec198a39 BLooper::task_looper(void) + 0000043d
fd076d28 ec19ae46 BLooper::_task0_(void *) + 00000036
fd076d3c ec06c50d thread_start + 00000039
Sikosis:
any ideas ?
|
|
| IMAP Re-connection |
|
|
By NathanW - Posted on July 11, 2003 - 01:16:43 (#8116)
Current version when comment was posted: 2.1.0 Release Candidate 2 |
|
|
I'll take a look at adding it.
|
|
| Too many errors |
|
|
By ryanknapper - Posted on July 10, 2003 - 21:02:37 (#8113)
Current version when comment was posted: 2.1.0 Release Candidate 2 |
|
|
Whenever my IMAP server goes down (frequently expected) I receive an error message with every synchronise attempt. Would it be possible to only notify on the first error, then supress other messages until after it succesfully connects once again?
|
|
| Thanks Guys! Keep up the great work! |
|
|
By kancept - Posted on July 10, 2003 - 03:05:32 (#8102)
Current version when comment was posted: 2.1.0 Release Candidate 2 |
|
|
RC2 fixed the filter problems I was having. Everything is working great and I have had no errors. Most of my filters are set back up, and it's good to go. Thanks!
|
|
| More victims on the list |
|
|
By Icewarp - Posted on July 10, 2003 - 02:50:42 (#8100)
Current version when comment was posted: 2.1.0 Release Candidate 2 |
|
|
Hey, now we can add all the People who also speaks Portuguese to SDO bothering list.
You say people miss the point, you miss completely your mind showing your prejudice. Poor you, this is a illness much more worst than your stupidy, or better, this is illegal.
Back to the point, you have to notice that getting this software is a privilege, not a right.
Now I will stop to feed yuor desire to argue about something.
Farewell and good luck in talking alone, asshole :D
|
|
| I already new |
|
|
By Icewarp - Posted on July 10, 2003 - 02:31:21 (#8097)
Current version when comment was posted: 2.1.0 Release Candidate 2 |
|
|
Hahaha I already knew it. This stupid guy has the only aim to complain. I told before, Why don't you do something if it is not good to you?
It is funny how people talk shit like a machinegun hiding behind a keyboard with no will. Hey SDO, you need a girlfriend, get a life.
|
|
| Talk about waste of time... |
|
|
By Philippe Houdoin - Posted on July 9, 2003 - 22:05:25 (#8090)
Current version when comment was posted: 2.1.0 Release Candidate 2 |
|
|
SDO, I *really* hope you have spent 1% of the time you waste in these *posts* here in writing down a full detailed bug report mail, your system specs included.
This version is "Release Candidate". The important word here is "candidate", not release. That's not suppose to be perfect, and it CAN'T be tested in every system configuration, that why such project needs users contributions to help testing it. Hence current and previous *releases*.
BTW, if it's "ONE FUNCTION, one easy to fix problem, very obvious defect", why didn't debug this bug yourself and sent team a patch. If you don't have the skills to do it yourself, at least use the "Report a bug" on MDR bebits page.
Put shortly, contribute, instead of just whinning/trolling...
If you don't even care about helping this project team to figure out in which special case(s) *your* send bug
raise, then shut up. Nobody deserve you anything, that's open-source, free as in speech and beer software and his BSD licence allow you to get it and make whatever you want with it, but if you can't stand this project, simply ignore it.
Or grab the source and make what you want with it, it's under BSD licence...
But stop trolling.
|
|
| Thanks |
|
|
By brian68 - Posted on July 9, 2003 - 20:05:07 (#8087)
Current version when comment was posted: 2.1.0 Release Candidate 2 |
|
|
SDO: Neat. You've fixed nothing. You've educated no one. You've encouraged the developers *NOT* to even review this page in the future. 100% troll. Thanks.
|
|
| Re: Bug |
|
|
By Rene Gollent - Posted on July 9, 2003 - 19:48:17 (#8085)
Current version when comment was posted: 2.1.0 Release Candidate 2 |
|
|
Yes, that would be why you're the only one complaining about crashing on send.
|
|
| Re: SDO |
|
|
By Rene Gollent - Posted on July 9, 2003 - 19:31:40 (#8083)
Current version when comment was posted: 2.1.0 Release Candidate 2 |
|
|
Really? I saw no such bug with RC2 on my system. Learn the lesson well bud, software behaves very differently on different people's systems. Just because the bug happened to you does not mean it happens to anyone and everyone. This is precisely why software has to be tested on a wide variety of systems to be reliable, particularly in the PC world where there is next to no common ground on what someone might be running. Ball's back in your court, you're just digging your own grave.
|
|
| Re: SDO |
|
|
By Rene Gollent - Posted on July 9, 2003 - 19:10:34 (#8080)
Current version when comment was posted: 2.1.0 Release Candidate 2 |
|
|
Ha. I'm ashamed of nothing. You complain about shoddy testing. Well wake up, smell the coffee, and read. This *IS* the version for testing. That was already pointed out to you but you're evidently too blind to see it. And that's really my final word of the subject. If anyone should be ashamed, it's you for wasting people's time with this crap.
|
|
| Talkback forum. |
|
|
By BGA - Posted on July 9, 2003 - 18:38:24 (#8076)
Current version when comment was posted: 2.1.0 Release Candidate 2 |
|
|
For obvious reasons, this forum will not be followed by me anymore and, in fact, I will recommend all other developers involved in the project to completelly ignore it. If you have any questions you need addressed, mail us at bemaildaemon-talk@bug-br.org.br and we will be more than glad to help you.
-Bruno
|
|
| Re: SDO |
|
|
By Rene Gollent - Posted on July 9, 2003 - 18:30:01 (#8075)
Current version when comment was posted: 2.1.0 Release Candidate 2 |
|
|
Since you're evidently more blind than any of those of which you accuse of being "Three blind mice", I'm not even going to dignify this with any further responses. Get a life.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
| |
Recent Downloads - # 10
Total Downloads - # 69
Total Views - # 44
User Ratings - # 83
|
|
|
|
 |
| |
E-Mail
|
|
|
|
 |
|
1. BePodder - 9.80
2. QEMU - 9.68
3. ScummVM - 9.57
4. cpu_fix - 9.42
5. Jukebox - 9.40
6. libdl.so - 9.40
7. Haiku AGP busm... - 9.35
8. vim6 - 9.31
9. Beezer - 9.26
10. HandBrake - 9.25
|
|
|
|
 |
|
1. BeOS 5 Perso... - 13,596
2. Realtek RTL8... - 13,110
3. Ati Radeon G... - 12,574
4. Ensoniq Audio... - 7,564
5. ATI Rage 128... - 7,440
6. USB Joystick... - 5,663
7. Broadcom 440x... - 5,410
8. S3 Trio 64 v2... - 4,725
9. USB Serial dr... - 4,707
10. Intel Extreme... - 4,468
|
|
|
|
 |
| You are not logged in.
Login
|
|
|
|
 |
|
