 |
|
| Anyone willing to take over? |
|
|
By verranm - Posted on March 5, 2004 - 17:18:26 (#11340)
Current version when comment was posted: TinyCOBOL 0.60 |
|
|
I've left BeOS, I'll still be about, but not an active BeOS user.
This Open Source project has been very receptive to the non-Linux contributions I've made with the help of mmu_man, if anyone is interested in this, please let me know. The source compiles 'with persuasion'. Give me a shout for any questions.
|
|
| Missing Library? |
|
|
By tuishimi - Posted on February 8, 2004 - 22:39:53 (#10980)
Current version when comment was posted: TinyCOBOL 0.60 |
|
|
I installed tC to try it out. Built one of the sample programs (builds fine) and tried to run it. I get the error :
$ example1
sh: ./example1: Missing library
Anyone else encounter this?
Mike
ps - running BeOS R5 Pro. No Bone.
|
|
| PPC port |
|
|
By verranm - Posted on November 10, 2002 - 17:10:51 (#4113)
Current version when comment was posted: 0.59 |
|
|
If you know anything about the cross compile tools I'd be willing to have a go... email me or catch me on BeShare (M)
|
|
| TinyCOBOL and Postgresql |
|
|
By verranm - Posted on November 10, 2002 - 17:09:04 (#4112)
Current version when comment was posted: 0.59 |
|
|
TinyCOBOL can be programmed to work with Postgresql. Take a look at www.tinycobol.net, theres some sample code that you can try out. Example tdb03 will build with some makefile editing (change /usr/local to /boot/home/config). I've not had it working successfully, but give it a shot!
|
|
| Postgres support would be good |
|
|
By nymia - Posted on November 10, 2002 - 16:37:47 (#4109)
Current version when comment was posted: 0.59 |
|
|
Go with the PostgreSQL support. It wouldn't hurt.
You might suddenly find yourself supporting a lot COBOL coders out there, though.
|
|
| Why not? |
|
|
By brian68 - Posted on November 10, 2002 - 16:12:54 (#4108)
Current version when comment was posted: 0.59 |
|
|
Bring it on! If you can cross-compile, I'd love to get a PPC version.
|
|
| Another version? or CGI COBOL anyone? |
|
|
By verranm - Posted on June 17, 2002 - 20:02:07 (#1857)
Current version when comment was posted: 0.58 |
|
|
Anyone want to see CGI COBOL?
Anyone bothered about another version?
|
|
| Try it out and comment |
|
|
By verranm - Posted on May 27, 2002 - 15:07:52 (#1581)
Current version when comment was posted: 0.57 alpha 3 |
|
|
Come on guys, this is one of the most steadily lucrative languages to program in, give your comments of how I can improve it! Should I look at getting it to build with Postgresql backend support? Where do you want to see it going?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
| |
Recent Downloads - # 275
Total Downloads - # 1,620
Total Views - # 941
User Ratings - N/A
|
|
|
|
 |
| |
Dev. Languages
|
|
|
|
 |
|
1. BePodder - 9.80
2. QEMU - 9.68
3. ScummVM - 9.57
4. Jukebox - 9.44
5. Haiku AGP busm... - 9.35
6. cpu_fix - 9.31
7. vim6 - 9.31
8. VNCServer - 9.30
9. Beezer - 9.26
10. HandBrake - 9.25
|
|
|
|
 |
|
1. Ati Radeon G... - 32,876
2. BeOS 5 Perso... - 32,449
3. Realtek RTL8... - 20,353
4. Ensoniq Audi... - 17,692
5. USB Joystick... - 16,553
6. BePDF - 15,349
7. ATI Rage 128... - 13,355
8. S3 Trio 64 v... - 10,305
9. VLC Media Pla... - 9,559
10. DOSBox - 9,466
|
|
|
|
 |
| You are not logged in.
Login
|
|
|
|
 |
|
