 |
|
| Re antiword output to a file |
|
|
By edmundf - Posted on March 27, 2006 - 02:50:32 (#19295)
Current version when comment was posted: 0.37 |
|
|
|
| antiword output to a file |
|
|
By Pete G. - Posted on March 25, 2006 - 14:43:19 (#19285)
Current version when comment was posted: 0.37 |
|
|
Simple fix:
"antiword -a a4 wordfile.doc >wordfile.pdf"
Antiword is one of those common command-line apps that only send results to 'standard output' which is by default the Terminal. If you want a file, you must redirect to it, using the '>' character as above. HTH.
|
|
| So close and yet so far |
|
|
By edmundf - Posted on March 25, 2006 - 04:19:40 (#19273)
Current version when comment was posted: 0.37 |
|
|
BeoS R5.03
I tried to convert a M$Word doc using the terminal.
I did antiword -a a4 wordfile.doc.
In the terminal I see a PDF doc appear but it is like
looking at a source code.
No pdf file is saved anywhere, just to see if it actually does anything useful, I cut and paste this terminal output in stylededit and saved it.
Guess what, I can open this with BePDF.
( after an other bigger testfile, BePDF asked for a password ?? )
Anyway it seems to work but what must I do to save a
PDF file automatically?
This really would be a great help for us BeoS users
|
|
| Re: ..Options |
|
|
By Pete G. - Posted on January 30, 2006 - 16:11:56 (#18955)
Current version when comment was posted: 0.36 |
|
|
> No I used the xicon to drop a file on.
Heh -- I guess xicon is sometimes a little *too* convenient... (:-)
Glad you're using it though!
I'd guess you're also using Zeta? This probably has some different assumptions for default coding.
Try getting it to work from a Terminal first. Then you can just open up the xicon script in StyledEdit or somewhere and change the antiword line appropriately.
(And, yes, I do see there is now a 0.37 source available. I';; update BeBits when I get a chance.)
|
|
| Re. Try some options... |
|
|
By edmundf - Posted on January 30, 2006 - 11:50:08 (#18948)
Current version when comment was posted: 0.36 |
|
|
.........
> Try choosing the mapping with "-m 8859-1".
> If you just want to read the text, don't use the "-p" > switch at all (which I assume you are...)
No I used the xicon to drop a file on.
I tried that before on BeOS R 5.03 and it worked.
|
|
| Re: |
|
|
By ModeenF - Posted on January 30, 2006 - 01:55:25 (#18943)
Current version when comment was posted: 0.36 |
|
|
To early (07:55).. it was R1.1.. not that it make any differens :)
|
|
| Re: |
|
|
By ModeenF - Posted on January 30, 2006 - 01:53:59 (#18942)
Current version when comment was posted: 0.36 |
|
|
I did a compile from source with no problem on my Zeta R1 .. Did move the Make.beos file that I found (think that it was antiword that had one.. Have tested some other programs so I don't remember).
I did not test it exept run antiword in the terminal..
|
|
| version 0.37 |
|
|
By rgb@free.fr - Posted on January 29, 2006 - 23:57:51 (#18941)
Current version when comment was posted: 0.36 |
|
|
is available, can you make update
thanks,
|
|
| Try some options... |
|
|
By Pete G. - Posted on January 29, 2006 - 17:13:19 (#18940)
Current version when comment was posted: 0.36 |
|
|
I don't see that problem (PS & UTF-8) on my system, but it sounds like antiword is somehow selecting
UTF-8 as the current mapping on your setup.
Try choosing the mapping with "-m 8859-1".
If you just want to read the text, don't use the "-p" switch
at all (which I assume you are...)
|
|
| Problems with UTF-8 |
|
|
By edmundf - Posted on January 29, 2006 - 05:20:22 (#18935)
Current version when comment was posted: 0.36 |
|
|
With many windoze docs I get :
"The combination Postscript and UTF-8 is not supported"
Is there anything I can do to fix that or is there an
update somewhere?
Thanks, I really need something to read these
M$ docs :-(
|
|
| Good work |
|
|
By edmundf - Posted on December 20, 2003 - 08:16:55 (#10060)
Current version when comment was posted: 0.35 |
|
|
Now I can see images send by aliens who still encrypt there messages in Windoze language. ( gobe doesn't ).
|
|
| How does Antiword compare with GP2's support for Doc files? |
|
|
By Prognathous - Posted on May 6, 2003 - 07:39:00 (#7196)
Current version when comment was posted: 0.33 |
|
|
I've been using Gobe for quite some time and find it satisfactory, does Antiword provide any significant advantages?
Prog.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
| |
Recent Downloads - # 668
Total Downloads - # 1,019
Total Views - # 339
User Ratings - N/A
|
|
|
|
 |
| |
Productivity Utilities
Word Processors
|
|
|
|
 |
|
1. BePodder - 9.80
2. QEMU - 9.68
3. ScummVM - 9.57
4. Jukebox - 9.44
5. Haiku AGP busm... - 9.35
6. cpu_fix - 9.31
7. vim6 - 9.31
8. VNCServer - 9.30
9. Beezer - 9.26
10. HandBrake - 9.25
|
|
|
|
 |
|
1. Ati Radeon G... - 32,894
2. BeOS 5 Perso... - 32,466
3. Realtek RTL8... - 20,354
4. Ensoniq Audi... - 17,701
5. USB Joystick... - 16,564
6. BePDF - 15,356
7. ATI Rage 128... - 13,356
8. S3 Trio 64 v... - 10,309
9. VLC Media Pla... - 9,563
10. DOSBox - 9,477
|
|
|
|
 |
| You are not logged in.
Login
|
|
|
|
 |
|
