 |
|
| ArtPaint has a new home |
|
|
By jonas.kirilla - Posted on May 29, 2007 - 18:24:27 (#21685)
Current version when comment was posted: Nightly |
|
|
The source code is now hosted by OsDrawer.net
http://dev.osdrawer.net/projects/artpaint/
I can't make any promise to develop it further.
Time will tell.
|
|
| BePhoto Magic similar or same to Artpaint |
|
|
By kraton. - Posted on November 19, 2005 - 08:34:19 (#18390)
Current version when comment was posted: Nightly |
|
|
This one you can work with it is GPL...
http://darkwyrm.beemulated.net/apps.htm
|
|
| Anyone working on artpaint? |
|
|
By edmundf - Posted on November 18, 2005 - 09:05:20 (#18379)
Current version when comment was posted: Nightly |
|
|
I think it is by far the best program of his kind
for BeOS. I would love to see further developement.
|
|
| How to insert two line of text? |
|
|
By edmundf - Posted on October 2, 2005 - 07:19:23 (#17897)
Current version when comment was posted: Nightly |
|
|
In the window I only can insert one line of text.
How do I put a second line in this text field?
|
|
| ArtPaint Docs |
|
|
By lelldorin - Posted on October 16, 2004 - 06:39:17 (#14405)
Current version when comment was posted: Nightly |
|
|
Hello Developer ov ArtPaint 2.0
I translate the Art Paint Docs into german Language. When you want to include this docs into your Project, please contact us at: http://besly.mittilgart.de
|
|
| oooh! beware the dangers of UI tinkering...!!! |
|
|
By quakeyjase - Posted on March 18, 2004 - 08:18:53 (#11518)
Current version when comment was posted: Nightly |
|
|
If you are thinking of replacing ArtPaint 1.3 with this build though, you should be aware that some tools behave differently enough to be effectively broken over 1.3. (e.g. try multi-line layer->insert text).
Advice: get this anyway but only use it over 1.3 when you need the new filters - better still pay someone for a commercial image editor. If anyone else edits astronomical images ask me here about getting AIPS classic up and running - slightly more heavy duty than Photoshop.
It is still fab though for light use though.
|
|
| I still like this one |
|
|
By quakeyjase - Posted on February 22, 2004 - 10:04:30 (#11179)
Current version when comment was posted: Nightly |
|
|
It doesn't have the features of Photoshop, you don't need to make a cuppa while it loads every imaging filter known to man, it doesn't eat (such) vaste swathes of memory for no good reason...
Tt's not exactly the most bang-up job it could be but the simplicity and speed tends to astonish average Photoshope-rs I've shown it to.
I'm sorry, Adobe, but I'm not going to blow a grand for a giant tortoise of a thing just to tweak a few bitmaps.
|
|
| ArtPaint still one of my Main Apps |
|
|
By Daren Scot Wilson - Posted on January 21, 2004 - 01:25:37 (#10696)
Current version when comment was posted: Nightly |
|
|
Even though I have use of GIMP on a linux/gnu machine, ArtPaint remains one of my most-used apps. Layers are a powerful feature, and with cleverness I can do nearly anything i might in GIMP (or photoshop) though not always a efficiently. THe color selector is great, and makes all other color selection dialogs i've used look sucky. (I especially hate the color selection dialog in KDE. Blah!)
ArtPaint is plenty good enough for most everyday image tasks, in any case. I produced an art show booklet, with photos of winner's paintings, using ArtPaint and Gobe Productive.
Improvements I'd like to see include a "Levels" tool like in GIMP to show a histogram and sliders for black/white and gamma all in the same popup, expand the add-ons SDK to allow working with more than one layer at a time, and fix whatever causes occasional crashes. More add-ons, such as a median filter, which i use a lot in my work processing astronomical images.
Perhaps more exotic, but useful to me, would be ability to work with 16-bit or 32-bit RGB values. I have plenty need to work on images with wide dynamic range, subtle noise problems, etc.
|
|
| Artpaint rules! |
|
|
By kreeziiusr - Posted on January 16, 2004 - 18:33:04 (#10610)
Current version when comment was posted: Nightly |
|
|
I love the intelligent scissors tool, it was the first image manipulation app that i used and i still having it as preferred app :).
|
|
| yeah |
|
|
By mmu_man - Posted on January 16, 2004 - 17:40:13 (#10609)
Current version when comment was posted: Nightly |
|
|
even I am quite good at photo manipulation with this thing :)
|
|
| Awesome painting App |
|
|
By Inajamaica - Posted on January 16, 2004 - 11:40:34 (#10602)
Current version when comment was posted: Nightly |
|
|
This is a wonderful application. Uses layers, lets you save the layered project, AND lets you export to your favorite image type (flattens the project to one layer for the export).
I love it and it works in Zeta too! NICE!!!
|
|
| How to use the fill tool with a color? |
|
|
By edmundf - Posted on July 17, 2003 - 12:41:42 (#8214)
Current version when comment was posted: Nightly |
|
|
Besides this a big thank you for the hard work.
any change there will come a "cutout" and a line art tool?
ps what login and password do I need for the night build?
|
|
| Scriptability like Becasso |
|
|
By Super Dave Osbourne - Posted on June 25, 2003 - 19:30:47 (#7896)
Current version when comment was posted: Nightly |
|
|
Howdie, make this neat app work via BeMessages and the Hey program. It would be nice to have this application do a little more. Being able to marque (highlite) a section and create new image with selection at a specified width with proportions kept would be fantastic! Scriptin that in ScriptFu is relatively simple once SF is known. Doing it in ArtPaint via Hey would be fantastic too.
|
|
| s_d |
|
|
By MYOB - Posted on April 19, 2003 - 06:28:57 (#6938)
Current version when comment was posted: Nightly |
|
|
try this: http://web.archive.org/web/19991128173723/http://www.bebits.com/app/482
Maybe the link there is archived too... all the later versions have marked broken links also.. this is an OLD link.... just look at the BeBits design in it
|
|
| Eugina ... |
|
|
By Jess - Posted on April 18, 2003 - 19:38:59 (#6933)
Current version when comment was posted: Nightly |
|
|
Ture ture but while 768 is semi the limit of ram for Be it can handle 1 gig fine... I'm on 1 gig of DDR 2100 atm but anything past 1 gig results in ze classic "No Bootus Suckus" :)
|
|
| RE: Cannot create or open large images - JohnWiggins BFIV |
|
|
By s_d - Posted on April 18, 2003 - 16:16:08 (#6931)
Current version when comment was posted: Nightly |
|
|
There was application capable to handle large files at price of HDD space, but this is gone.
http://www.bebits.com/app/482
I tried to find it (as it is open-source) when worked on BeAndSee, but without success that time:(
|
|
| RE: Cannot create or open large images |
|
|
By Eugenia - Posted on April 18, 2003 - 15:41:00 (#6930)
Current version when comment was posted: Nightly |
|
|
What did you expect? BeOS is not SGI. BeOS has a very sucky virtual memory handler, and it is almost impossible to load big files on memory, no matter how much RAM you got (this is why the SampleStudio guy had to write his own memory manager in order to get around the BeOS limitations).
And when ArtPaint was coded, the max RAM of the time was about 256 MB for most people, so the developer might have added that limitation to protect his program from crashing the whole OS.
To be honest, I am surprised BeOS works on your machine with 1 GB of RAM. Are you sure you don't have weird lockups at times? BeOS can't handle more than 1 GB of virtual and system memory you see...
|
|
| Cannot create or open large images |
|
|
By zoontf - Posted on April 18, 2003 - 15:24:08 (#6929)
Current version when comment was posted: Nightly |
|
|
Hello! Thanks for the hardwork on Artpaint! The community appreciates it.
I discovered that Artpaint cannot create an image larger than 9999x9999, which seems a silly limitation. Furthermore, it does not work on my system to do even that; it complains of not enough RAM. Well, I have 1gb of RAM, which ought to be enough. My SGI with 192mb of RAM can open larger images in the GIMP.
Furthermore, speaking of those larger images that the Gimp can open, but Artpaint cannot, I am unable to open images from my large format scanner that are roughly 12000x11000 pixels in size. I don't know how hard it is to implement this, but it would be nice to see!
Thanks again for all your work!
|
|
| Command problems |
|
|
By TwilightDawn - Posted on April 4, 2003 - 17:52:26 (#6729)
Current version when comment was posted: Nightly |
|
|
Has anyone else noticed a fairly major bug in ArtPaint where commands won't take effect? I can change the color with the color palette's RBG sliders but it never changes the color that's being drawn with. Also, sometimes when I select an object and move it, the program will not un-select the object, it alwayes remains active and I change tools or do anything but move it around. Thanks for any help anyone can give.
|
|
| Some responses ... |
|
|
By PaulAshford - Posted on March 12, 2003 - 20:00:25 (#6373)
Current version when comment was posted: Nightly |
|
|
I've modified my build scripts for the nightlies, as per the suggestions here. This should take affect tonight.
As for bug reports and enhancement suggestions:
Once the beunited.org developer portal is complete, there will be pages there for all of the projects hosted by beunited.org, with pages for submitted bug reports and enhancement requests. Until that time comes, you may either post comments here, or, try to contact the Project Lead for ArtPaint, Matt Emson. However, posting comments here, does not guarantee that Matt will get your request or bug report.
|
|
| Resolution |
|
|
By i18nde - Posted on March 7, 2003 - 19:53:58 (#6261)
Current version when comment was posted: Nightly |
|
|
Thanks for doing the work on. Great App! It would be fine if you could implement a changing resolution possibility.
|
|
| bug reporting |
|
|
By gaukler - Posted on March 7, 2003 - 12:03:43 (#6243)
Current version when comment was posted: Nightly |
|
|
Where should I report bugs? I get some interesting results when I crop.
mark
|
|
| Package structure |
|
|
By Super Dave Osbourne - Posted on March 7, 2003 - 11:34:24 (#6242)
Current version when comment was posted: Nightly |
|
|
Paul, glad to hear you are going to Do The Right Thing(tm)... It pisses me off that folks don't package in a directory structure, makes the app look really shotty on first impression. And that is the only lasting impression.
|
|
| Great to see a new release |
|
|
By danio - Posted on March 6, 2003 - 03:42:33 (#6221)
Current version when comment was posted: Nightly |
|
|
I didn't even realise there was still development on ArtPaint! I've been using the 1.3 release and been very happy with it so look forward to trying this version out.
If I make and host some screenshots can someone update the bebits page to point to them?
|
|
| Thanks Daniel .... |
|
|
By PaulAshford - Posted on March 5, 2003 - 16:57:10 (#6212)
Current version when comment was posted: Nightly |
|
|
I knew I would miss something :-)
|
|
| Other Changes |
|
|
By Switkin - Posted on March 5, 2003 - 16:39:58 (#6211)
Current version when comment was posted: Nightly |
|
|
I should also mention the following changes:
- Fixed a race condition where the app would hang when using multiple windows
- Added a number of keyboard shortcuts
- Removed all of the shareware/nagware popup windows and related code
|
|
| If it's worth doing... |
|
|
By tqh - Posted on March 5, 2003 - 09:04:17 (#6208)
Current version when comment was posted: Nightly |
|
|
It's worth doing right. :)
Thanks for preparing and doing releases. I understand the troubles of fixing up releases, and I don't expect the first releases to do everything perfectly but someday...
Keep up the good work
|
|
| Screenshots and Package Directory Structure |
|
|
By PaulAshford - Posted on March 5, 2003 - 08:36:12 (#6207)
Current version when comment was posted: Nightly |
|
|
Screenshots:
Sorry, but currently I just don't have the time to make screenshots for the application. Though I know it is a nice touch, I am also currently involved in one way or another with every applciation hosted by beunited.org, plus, the mozilla port and a couple of the projects. If I have time, I will try to make some, but, I won't make any promises.
Package Directory Structure:
I know that the structure is not perfect, though, it is only a convention, not a standard. I noticed the same thing, as I was creating the packages for ArmyKnife, FlipSide AE, and ReName! last night. It was just simpler to do it this way from within my scripts for building ArtPaint, than do do it the other way. Not to say I can't or won't change it, which, I will do. Thank you for the encouragement :-)
--
Paul Ashford
Director of Developer Relations
beunited.org
|
|
| Neato! |
|
|
By shaka@bebits - Posted on March 5, 2003 - 07:52:44 (#6205)
Current version when comment was posted: Nightly |
|
|
Nice work! Stable, clean fast, responsive -a true BeOStyle app!
|
|
| Palette |
|
|
By tqh - Posted on March 5, 2003 - 06:58:45 (#6203)
Current version when comment was posted: Nightly |
|
|
I'd love to see the palette window changed/integrated with Colors! The author has released the code and would probably not mind if asked.
Keep up the good work.
|
|
| Point taken |
|
|
By memson - Posted on March 5, 2003 - 05:37:42 (#6202)
Current version when comment was posted: Nightly |
|
|
Though I manage this project (PPC build will be possible real soon tm), I had nothing to do with this build. I've recentlt changed jobs and have had no Be Time. I was in the middle of porting the PowerPC changes to Intel when my development machine went back to my former employer. I'll have to merge my changes with Daniel's I guess. I've certainly found at least one bug in my testing!! (Try opening a 9mb Tiff file ;-)
When I finally get to doing a build, I'll make sure I use the structure!!
|
|
| Re: Packaging structure |
|
|
By mmu_man - Posted on March 5, 2003 - 05:09:22 (#6201)
Current version when comment was posted: Nightly |
|
|
I second this, it's a convention not only in BeOS (except for crappy windoze apps).
|
|
| Packaging structure |
|
|
By tqh - Posted on March 5, 2003 - 03:25:34 (#6200)
Current version when comment was posted: Nightly |
|
|
Why not use the same structure as every other BeOS application and the one recommended by Be where you pack all your program files and stuff in a single directory first. Like this:
100343 03-05-03 04:39 ArtPaint/add-ons/Wave
75767 03-05-03 04:39 ArtPaint/add-ons/Wood
1489323 03-05-03 05:04 ArtPaint/ArtPaint
instead of this:
100343 03-05-03 04:39 add-ons/Wave
75767 03-05-03 04:39 add-ons/Wood
1489323 03-05-03 05:04 ArtPaint
It's annoying to have crap all over your Desktop when there is a well endorsed standard.
|
|
| nice app |
|
|
By borg21 - Posted on March 5, 2003 - 02:27:37 (#6199)
Current version when comment was posted: Nightly |
|
|
Thanks for the great work.
Maybe few screenshots of ArtPaint on Bebits will be a good idea? It can be good encouragement :-).
|
|
|
|
|
